John fisher's personal transition curve - 2012
Anxiety
The awareness
that events lie outside one's range of understanding or control. I believe the
problem here is that individuals are unable to adequately picture the future.
They do not have enough information to allow them to anticipate behaving in a
different way within the new organisation. They are unsure how to adequately
construe acting in the new work and social situations. There is also the
possibility for what McCoy (1977) defined as 'bewilderment' here; which she
defined as an awareness of an imminent, comprehensive change in our non-core
structure. How we then deal with this dictates how we progress through the rest
of the curve and the extent of the impact on our core sense of self.
Happiness
The awareness
that one’s viewpoint is recognised and shared by others. The impact of this is
twofold. At the basic level there is a feeling of relief that something is
going to change and not continue as before. Whether the past is perceived
positively or negatively, there is still a feeling of anticipation and possibly
excitement at the possibility of improvement. On another level, there is the
satisfaction of knowing that some of your thoughts about the old system were
correct (generally no matter how well we like the status quo there is something
that is unsatisfactory about it) and that something is going to be done about.
In the phase we generally expect the best and anticipate a bright future,
placing our own construct system onto the change and seeing ourselves
succeeding. One of the dangers in this phase is that of the inappropriate
psychological contract. We may perceive more to the change, or believe we will
get more from the change than is actually the case. The organisation needs to
manage this phase and ensure unrealistic expectations are managed and redefined
in the organisations terms without alienating the individual.
The happiness
phase is one of the more interesting phases and may be (almost) passed through
without knowing. In this phase it is the 'Thank Goodness, something is
happening at last!' feeling coupled with the knowledge that we may be able to
have an impact, or take control, of our destiny and that if we are
lucky/involved/contribute things can only get better. If we can start
interventions at this stage we can minimise the impact of the rest of the curve
and virtually flatten the curve. By involving, informing, getting 'buy in' at
this time we can help people move through the process.
Fear
The awareness of
an imminent incidental change in one's core behavioural system. People will
need to act in a different manner and this will have an impact on both their
self-perception and on how others externally see them. However, in the main,
they see little change in their normal interactions and believe they will be
operating in much the same way, merely choosing a more appropriate, but new,
action.
According to
Frances (1999), Fear and Threat are the two key emotions that will cause us to
resist change.
Threat
The awareness of
an imminent comprehensive change in one's core behavioural structures. Here
people perceive a major change on what they believe to be their core identity
or sense of self. The realisation that change that will have a fundamental
impact on who we are, how we see ourselves and what is key in our personality
to us as individuals. This is the shock of suddenly discovering you're not who
you thought you were! It is a radical alteration to our future choices and
other people's perception of them as individuals. Their old choices are no
longer ones that will work. In many ways this is 'road to Damascus' type of
life-changing experience, one that has the potential to 'shake you to the
core!'. In this phase, people are unsure as to how they will be able to
act/react in what is, potentially, a totally new and alien environment - one
where the 'old rules' no longer apply and there are no 'new' ones established
as yet.
Guilt
An awareness of
a dislodgement of our self from our core self perception. We are not who we
thought we were! Once the individual begins exploring their self-perception,
how they acted/reacted in the past and looking at alternative interpretations
they begin to re-define their sense of self. This, generally, involves
identifying what are their core beliefs and how closely they have been to
meeting them. Recognition of the inappropriateness of their previous actions
and the implications for them as people can cause guilt as they realise the
impact of their behaviour. Another of the emotions that may have an impact here
is that of 'Shame', in Kellyian terms this is the awareness of a negative
change in someone else's opinion of you from what you think it should be. The
recognition of this shift in our own and other peoples opinion then leads into
the next stage.
Depression
The awareness
that our past actions, behaviours and beliefs are incompatible with our core
construct of our identity. The belief that our past actions mean we're not a
very nice person after all! This phase is characterised by a general lack of
motivation and confusion. Individuals are uncertain as to what the future holds
and how they can fit into the future 'world'. Their representations are
inappropriate and the resultant undermining of their core sense of self leaves
them adrift with no sense of identity and no clear vision of how to operate.
Gradual acceptance
Here we begin to
make sense of our environment and of our place within the change. In effect we
are beginning to get some validation of our thoughts and actions and can see
that where we are going is right. We are at the start of managing our control
over the change, make sense of the 'what' and 'why' and seeing some successes
in how we interact - there is 'a light at the end of the tunnel!' This links in
with an increasing level of Self-confidence, which in Kellyian terms is defined
as an awareness of the goodness of fit of the self in one's core role structure
- i.e., we feel good that we are doing the right things in the right way.
Moving forward
In this stage we
are starting to exert more control, make more things happen in a positive sense
and are getting our sense of self back. We know who we are again and are
starting to feel comfortable that we are acting in line with our convictions,
beliefs, etc. and making the right choices. In this phase we are, again,
experimenting within our environment more actively and effectively.
Disillusionment
The awareness
that your values, beliefs and goals are incompatible with those of the
organisation. The pitfalls associated with this phase are that the employee
becomes unmotivated, unfocused and increasingly dissatisfied and gradually
withdraws their labour, either mentally (by just 'going through the motions',
doing the bare minimum, actively undermining the change by
criticising/complaining) or physically by resigning. From personal experience I
can say I've left a company where I found myself becoming increasingly
disillusioned with them. My values and theirs were no longer matched and I felt
the gulf too big to accommodate whilst still staying true to my construct
system.
Hostility
The continued
effort to validate social predictions that have already proved to be a failure.
The problem here is that individual's continue to operate processes that have
repeatedly failed to achieve a successful outcome and are no longer part of the
new process or are surplus to the new way of working. The new processes are
ignored at best and actively undermined at worst.
Denial
This stage is
defined by a lack of acceptance of any change and denies that there will be any
impact on the individual. People keep acting as if the change has not happened,
using old practices and processes and ignoring evidence or information contrary
to their belief systems. In many ways when we are faced with a problem, or
situation, we don't want, or one that we believe is too challenging to our
sense of self we 'constrict' or narrow our range of construction. In this way
we eliminate the problem from our awareness. The 'head in the sand' syndrome -
if I can't see it, or acknowledge it then it doesn't exist!
Anger
I have come to
recognise over time that there seems to be some anger associated with moving
through the transition curve, especially in the earlier stages as we start to
recognise the wider implications of change. This is not always present as it
seems to be depending on the amount of control people feel they have over the
overall process and the focus of the anger changes over time. In the first
instance, for those where change is 'forced' on them, the anger appears to be
directed outward at other people. They are 'blamed' for the situation and for
causing stress to the individual etc. However, as time progresses and the
implications grow greater for the individual the anger moves inwards and there
is a danger that this drives us into the 'Guilt' and 'Depression' stages. We
become angry at ourselves for not knowing better and/or allowing the situation
to escalate outside our control.
Complacency
It has also been
suggested that there is also actually a final (initial stage?) of Complacency
(King 2007). Here people have survived the change, rationalised the events,
incorporated them into their new construct system and got used to the new
reality. This is where we feel that we have, once again, moved into our
'comfort zone' and that we will not encounter any event that is either outside
our construct system (or world view) or that we can't incorporate into it with
ease. We know the right decisions and can predict future events with a high
degree of certainty. They are subsequently laid back, not really interested in
what's going on around them and coasting through the job almost oblivious to
what is actually happening around them. They are, again, operating well within
their comfort zone and in some respects can't see what all the fuss has been
about. Even though the process may have been quite traumatic for them at the
time!
A Brief Summary of the 2012 Transition Theory
It can be seen
from the transition curve that it is important for an individual to understand
the impact that the change will have on their own personal construct systems;
and for them to be able to work through the implications for their self
perception. Any change, no matter how small, has the potential to impact on an
individual and may generate conflict between existing values and beliefs and
anticipated altered ones.
To help people
move through the transition effectively we need to understand their perception
of the past, present and future. What is their past experience of change and
how has it impacted on them?, how did they cope? Also what will they be losing
as part of the change and what will they be gaining?
Therefore the
goal of the 'manager'/change agent is to help make the transition as effective
and painless as possible. By providing education, information, support, etc. we
can help people transition through the curve and emerge on the other side.
One of the
dangers for individuals is that once we are caught up in the emotion of the
change we may miss the signs (e.g., of threat, anxiety, etc) in ourselves and
others. This could cause us to react by, or adopt a coping strategy of,
complaining to anyone who will listen, and probably anyone who won't! Or we
attempt to make things as they were (which also increase our stress levels as a
result) and actively resist any attempts to change us.
I would argue
that we transit through all stages (although the old caveat of some of these
stages may be extremely quickly traversed and not consciously recognisable
applies). In the main we will progress through all the phases in a linear or
sequential way (although we may move in either direction as circumstances
change throughout. Each stage builds on the last stage and incorporates any
learning (positive and negative) from our experience.
So we can see
that our perception of the situation could be escalating in 'severity' of
impact and importance to our sense of self as we go through the phases. We
descend into the trough of depression via a small impact on our sense of self
(anxiety), speed up through a greater realisation of impact and meaning (fear,
threat) and then comes the realisation that (potentially) our core sense of
self has been impacted and our 'self belief system' undermined to a large
extent (guilt, depression) which contradicts who we thought we were.
Now if someone
is going through multiple transitions at the same time; these could have a
cumulative impact on them as individuals. As people could being going through
all the different transitions almost simultaneously - it then becomes a case of
more and more 'evidence' all of which is supporting previous negative a rapidly
dropping self confidence and increasingly negative self image which just compounds
the problem. We end up similar to the 'frozen rabbit in the headlights not
knowing which way to turn'!.
As with any
personal transformation, there are no clear boundaries to any of these stages.
It is more of a gradual realisation that things have subtly changed. On a
personal note my mother had a major stroke some years ago that has left her
incapacitated down one side; over the succeeding years I've noticed that our
benchmark of how we see her has gradually lowered over time - the 'highs' are
lower and the good days less good - but, as in many walks of life, they become
the new norm.
With your teams,
it is more a case of helping people through the process as effectively as
possible. Also as each person will experience transition through the curve at
slightly different speeds (and, as I mentioned earlier, we may be at different
places on different curves - depending on just what is happening to us at the
time).
Much of the
speed of transition will depend on the individual's self perception, locus of
control, and other past experiences, and how these all combine to create their
anticipation of future events. The more positive you see the outcome, the more
control you have (or believe you have) over both the process and the final
result the less difficult and negative a journey you have.
Source: http://www.businessballs.com/personalchangeprocess.htm
Comments
Post a Comment